People have the different opinion about what should be included in the educational curriculum. While some people think that practical subjects provide more advantages to students, I would argue that both practical and academic subjects are equally beneficial.

To begin with, it is believed that learners gain more benefits when studying practical subjects. As students are exposed to a number of efficient skills, they would be better prepared for their future careers. For instance, if children are taught how simple machines work at school, they are more likely to become competent mechanics later.

Secondly, students may apply what they have learned during the practical subjects’ lessons immediately. A good example is that after students learn basic dishes’ recipes, they are able to cook for their families at home. Meanwhile, it takes students longer to acknowledge the significance of academic disciplines such as chemistry and history.

On the opposite side, I firmly hold the read that educational subjects are of equal importance for a variety of reasons. One of the most obvious is that these subjects create a solid foundation on that practical skills are further developed.

To elaborate, teachers may find it hard to explain how to fix electronic appliances if students are not well-equipped with the fundamentals of electricity which could only be found in physics lessons. Another reason is that in order to be admitted to prestigious universities or colleges, learners must have sufficient academic performances. That cannot attend their dream universities if they place an excellent stress on practical subjects.

In conclusion, although youngsters are advised to learn practical subjects, I am of the opinion that the academic counterparts play an equally important role.